What is the background of the Kantian ethics
Philosophy is in! «was the headline of the weekly newspaper The time recently in an editorial. And indeed: thinking about the essence of people, dealing with the fundamental questions can still serve as orientation in everyday management. We find the essential anchor points of our culture in occidental philosophy.
As a central result of his reflections, for example, the philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804) left us four questions that reflect the challenges facing managers and companies:
1. What can I know?
2. What should I do?
3. What can I hope for?
4. What is man?
Before you come to an assessment, as a manager you should look closely and ask: What does one perceive, what the other? Who says what and what is the motivation? How does someone come to his statements? This requires a high level of mindfulness. The more interfaces there are to be managed in the organization, the more important it will be to contrast perceptions and include different perspectives. Because everyone can only know as much as they are able to compare their own knowledge with that of others. Knowledge thus becomes a community action, a process of joint thinking and thinking ahead - with the aim of finding a solution that most closely matches reality.In relation to companies: What needs to be done so that knowledge work can function as best as possible? A characteristic of the new service economy is the networking of knowledge with the aim of increasing customer benefits. Only if the divisional silos in an organization are broken down and the knowledge carriers seek dialogue can the best solution be found in the interests of the customer. How well this lively problem-solving network works depends less on processes and structures than on the corporate culture: Do colleagues trust each other? Is communication running smoothly? How are the different characters and talents integrated? How do you succeed in harmonizing the cultures of different locations and countries? It is up to the manager to demand a culture of collaboration and dialogue.
With his writing To eternal peace Kant promoted the evolution of man towards cooperation. For him it is clear: Peace is not a natural state, but has to be worked for hard by people repeatedly approaching each other, arguing with each other in a cultivated manner and reconciling. And it is this ability that makes companies successful today. Admittedly: In tough competition you also need a certain amount of aggressiveness, but it should be channeled towards winning - as a team.
In order to bring the organization into a mode of the best possible cooperation, it has to go through a process of cultural change. Because walls and prejudices cannot be removed overnight. Getting involved in a joint development process, addressing unpleasant topics and expressing concerns requires courage. In order for cooperation to succeed, everyone must be ready to accept feedback and correct themselves - even more: to renew themselves. If this open discussion does not succeed and a non-aggression pact is agreed, there will be a false peace that paralyzes the entire company.There are two contradicting drafts of important philosophers on the third question: Aristotle speaks of humans as zoon politikon, as herd animals that feel cared for and belong in the tribal society, in the family. Here people experience security and security, but archaic bonding forces such as loyalties or fear of loss also work here. According to this definition, a company strictly separates inside and outside. Conflicts stay below the surface, which is why the group works in itself, but has no dynamics. Kant, on the other hand, emphasizes the individual. According to him, man is free to use his own understanding. Enlightenment is the exit of man from his self-inflicted immaturity.
What does the Aristotelian view of man mean for dealing with change? So that the team structure does not completely freeze, a manager has the task of showing other ways, breaking taboos and using a structural reorganization for reorientation. In the sense of Kant, the manager would above all encourage people to think for themselves and entrust them with challenging tasks. Yet for most people, fear of punishment is less than fear of personal failure. Therefore, many employees shy away from setting something in motion themselves.
A good manager bridges the gap between the two images of man and does justice to both the zoon politikon and the emancipated individual. Leading means promoting the individual and always paying attention to his or her loyalty to the group. Then the development from I to We succeeds throughout the organization.The sensible prevails! Wherever work is experienced as a place of personal development, as meaningful and where employees see themselves as an active part of a knowledge community, they will also make a noticeable contribution. Committed employees are looking for just such an environment. The number one chief task is therefore the development of meaning, the formulation of a philosophy, a guiding star. Only when the way is shown can a community be formed that unites for a specific cause. People have a need for alignment. If a company is unclear about its goal, energy is wasted because everyone is building their own future.
The development of meaning is a two-stage process. First a vision has to be developed, and in a second step the meaning has to be made for everyone else. Each individual has to find access to it, gain a concrete picture of it and assign himself personally. If the picture of the future is convincing, the group wants to achieve something together that others benefit from. Without a vision of the future, the future of a company is literally inconceivable.
- Will NIFTY fall in January
- How reliable is the Seiko SKX
- Who do you have Mayweather or McGregor
- What is Nadia Comaneci best known for
- How many programming languages do programmers use
- Which artery carries oxygen-free blood
- How can I brew makgeolli
- Who is the God before Jesus
- What is software configuration management
- Drag queens to mock women
- Which Australian politician irritates you the most
- Can be more addicting to Suboxone than heroin
- How does this accordion work
- How is freshman housing in the northwest
- Why is Iran unstable
- Are iPad apps available on the Mac?
- What does alliance mean in politics
- How to darken pink color
- Are there still urban quiet places
- Which book did you read last year?
- To what extent is amorality angry
- How do we go anyway
- Basically NXT replaced OVW
- Is the Beetlejuice musical worth seeing